How communication approaches impact mergers and acquisitions outcomes
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mergers and Acquisitions
what a merger is and how it differs from an acquisition; some of the reasons why companies merge; the underlying merger rationales; what a merger driver is; what the primary merger drivers are; the difference between horizontal integration, vertical integration and conglomeration; the basic merger lifecycle and lifecycle phases; some basic measures of success for mergers; the ...
متن کاملMergers and Acquisitions: Strategic - Organizational Fit and Outcomes
This paper examines the effects of resource complementarity and organizational compatibility on merger and acquisition (M&A) outcomes. We also explore the effect of firms' previous M&A experiences. Our investigation focuses on two classes of events following M&As: organizational dissolution and involvement in subsequent M&As, with the firm continuance following the M&A as the “non-event.” Using...
متن کاملMergers and acquisitions: caution
They say fools of venture where angels fear to tread . Up until now , there's been no precedent for a successful technology merger of the size of the HP and Compaq merger. The most quoted failure is the merger of computer vendors Burroughs and Sperry. In 1986 these two merged their dissimilar operations and very different corporate cultures. Unisys, the resulting company, briefly held second pl...
متن کاملInternationalize Mergers and Acquisitions
As globalization processes, an increasing number of companies use mergers and acquisitions as a tool to achieve company growth in the international business world. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the process of an international M&A and analyze the factors leading to success. The research started with reviewing different academic theory. The important aspects in both pre-M&A phase a...
متن کاملEVAluating Mergers and Acquisitions– How to avoid overpaying
The empirical evidence overwhelmingly concludes that in most merger and acquisition transactions, the value created typically goes to the shareowners of the target companies, i.e. acquirers typically overpay. There are two major reasons for this. First acquirers overestimate the value of the target firm and/or the value of the synergies that they will add. Second the rewards of most acquirers’ ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The International Journal of Human Resource Management
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0958-5192,1466-4399
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2014.985330